writer ss 
A federal judge in Texas has allowed President Biden’s immigration plan to continue
A federal judge in Texas has allowed President Biden’s immigration plan to continue. This plan lets a limited number of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela enter the U.S. for humanitarian reasons. The program permits up to 30,000 asylum-seekers from these four countries to enter the U.S. each month. The judge rejected a challenge from Republican-led states that claimed the program created economic problems for them.
The program aims to encourage migrants to use the Biden administration’s preferred ways of entering the U.S. or face strict punishments. Since the program started in fall 2022, more than 357,000 people from the four nations have been allowed to enter the country through January.
State Concerns and Federal Responses
The states argued that the program is forcing them to spend millions on healthcare, education, and public safety for the migrants. They claimed it created an “unofficial immigration system.” However, advocates for the federal government said that the migrants admitted through the policy helped with a shortage of workers on U.S. farms.
Judge Tipton questioned how Texas could claim financial losses if data showed that the parole program reduced the number of migrants coming into the U.S. The federal government also argued that in many cases, migrants from these countries are fleeing oppressive governments, increasing violence, and worsening political situations that have put their lives in danger.
Program Requirements and Rejections
To be eligible, migrants must apply online, arrive at an airport, and have a financial sponsor in the U.S. If approved, they can stay for two years and get a work permit. The federal government stated that some migrants who reached the final approval step after arriving in the U.S. have been rejected, though they did not provide the number of rejections.
Legal Challenges and Appeals
The lawsuit is among several legal challenges the Biden administration has faced over immigration policies. An appeal to the judge’s ruling seemed likely. The judge had previously ruled against the Biden administration in 2022 on an order that determined who to prioritize for deportation.
