Louise Haigh Case Highlights Looming Recruitment Challenges

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

The Employment Rights Bill presented by the Labour Party is likely to revolutionise employment in the UK and employers are concerned that the changes will create unfavourable consequences that may reduce their willingness to offer employment. The new law to improve worker rights that have been supported by Angela Rayner is seen by private sector managers as a threat that will expose them to new risks while recruiting employees and cost them more money. Again, the measures contained in the bill, alongside potential changes to National Insurance contributions, are likely to revolutionise the process of staff acquisition throughout British organisations.

With the recent resignation of Louise Haigh having been linked to revelations about a historic fraud offence, workplace accountability has turned out to be a main concentrate in discussions. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch used it to cast aspersions on the vetting of Sir Keir Starmer, and the dangers employers put themselves in when hiring. It also raises a question about the heightened involvement of recruitment in the present and ever more restrictive employment regime.

Keep Reading


The combinations of these reforms are of great concern to the employers as the following consequences are likely to ensue. Employees’ rights such as ensuring that the staff cannot be dismissed unlawfully from their first day at work and the expansion of paternity and sick pay are enshrined in the Employment Rights Bill at the same time as huge rises in National Insurance employer costs – could be a difficult proposition for businesses.

As the government encourages the proper integration of individuals with past criminal records into society, particularly employment status, private industry executives have been growing more careful. This is because the proposed £25bn tax increase on employer National Insurance contributions together with the extension of workers’ rights may well stifle recruitment and create a more risk-oversee attitude towards employment.

Many employers accept that there is a requirement for modernised labour laws, which is why, as it is now, the UK ranks comparatively low among wealthy countries in terms of employment rights. However, they worry that the overall integration of extensive legislative measures and substantial financial effects would drastically alter the hiring patterns and practically restrict candidate choices.


writer ss

Recent Posts

UK Defence Boost to Create Scottish Jobs, Says Reeves

During the Babcock Fife visit, Chancellor Rachel Reeves raised UK export finance program funds by £2 billion. The new funding…

March 14, 2025

Tamil Nadu Govt Announces ₹20,000 for Every Gig Workers to Purchase E-Scooters

In a major decision, Tamil Nadu Finance Minister Thangam Thenarasu presented a new scheme in the state’s 2025-26 budget through…

March 14, 2025

Tesla Expands Autonomous Testing Fleet in California

Tesla started operating 224 driver trainers with 104 vehicles under its autonomous driving test permit in December in California. In…

March 14, 2025

Federal Judge Halts Trump’s Agency Staff Purge, Orders Reinstatements

Judge William Alsup finds federal government should restore positions to all probationary workers whose employment ended unlawfully. On Thursday a…

March 13, 2025

New UK Immigration Rules: Care Firms Must Hire Local Migrant Workers First

The UK government has brought in new regulations for employing staff within the care industry. From April 9, 2025 care…

March 13, 2025

Afghan Migrants in Panama: Facing Hard Choices and an Uncertain Future

Afghan migrants deported from the United States to Panama now face an uncertain future. Many of these deportees feel stranded…

March 13, 2025