Senior Reporter 
Background of the Starbucks Labor Case – In February 2022, seven baristas at a Starbucks shop in Memphis, Tennessee, were fired for allegedly breaking company rules during a union organizing campaign.
Background of the Starbucks Labor Case – In February 2022, seven baristas at a Starbucks shop in Memphis, Tennessee, were fired for allegedly breaking company rules during a union organizing campaign. The NLRB sought an injunction to reinstate the workers, citing the need to protect labour rights. A federal judge granted the injunction, and the workers were rehired in September 2022. Starbucks has appealed the case, arguing that the injunction was unnecessary.
Legal Standards at Issue in the Starbucks Labor Case
The Supreme Court is tasked with deciding which legal standard federal courts should use in such cases. Currently, different appeals courts apply different tests. Some courts use a two-part test, while others use a four-part test. Starbucks argues that the four-part test is more appropriate, as it considers factors such as the likelihood of success in proving unfair labour practices and the public interest.
Potential Impact of the Ruling in the Starbucks Labor Case
The outcome of this case could have wide-ranging implications for labour organizing in the United States. If the Supreme Court rules in favour of Starbucks, it may make it harder for workers to obtain injunctions for reinstatement during ongoing labour disputes. However, the impact may be limited, as Starbucks has already rehired the workers and agreed to negotiate with the union.
The Starbucks labour case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding labour organizing and the role of the NLRB in protecting workers’ rights. The Supreme Court’s decision, in this case, could shape the future of labour relations in the United States.
