UK courts may disregard interim ECHR rulings under the new human rights agenda

WhatsAppWhatsAppFacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterPinterestPinterestRedditRedditGmailGmailShareShare

United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom – Under a new draft bill, the British government has vowed to block interim judgments from the European Court of Human Rights from being enforceable in British courts.

The contentious U.K. deportation flight to Rwanda was temporarily blocked by ECHR involvement, prompting the publication of the long-promised British Bill of Rights, which would replace the Human Rights Act established by the previous Labour administration.

The U.K. Ministry of Justice (MoJ), which will outline the draft law on Wednesday, claims that its proposal will relieve British courts from the requirement to always follow Strasbourg court case law. It shall be made clear that the UK Supreme Court is the last judge on matters pertaining to human rights.

According to government plans, British courts would not be bound by interim decisions made by the ECHR under so-called Rule 39, which is applicable in circumstances where “there is an imminent risk of irreparable damage.”

Related Posts

The ECHR’s decision to grant interim injunctions delaying the relocation of numerous asylum seekers from London to Rwanda, which placed a major immigration program on hold, incited outrage in the U.K.’s ruling Conservative Party, leading to the introduction of the bill.

The MoJ stated that the government will maintain “the U.K.’s fundamental commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights” despite pressure from some Tory MPs who wanted the U.K. to renounce the European Convention on Human Rights, which serves as the court’s legal foundation.

The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement, which assisted in putting an end to decades of sectarian bloodshed in Northern Ireland, also includes membership in the ECHR as a supporting tenet.

The bill also takes steps to make it easier to deport criminals who were born abroad by allowing future laws to limit the circumstances in which their right to a family life can be invoked. It also promises a tougher standard for courts to take into account before they can order journalists to disclose sources.

About Senior Reporter

With over more than 6 years of writing obituaries for the local paper, Senior Reporter has a uniquely strong voice that shines through in his newest collection of essays and articles, which explores the importance we place on the legacy.

Senior Reporter

With over more than 6 years of writing obituaries for the local paper, Senior Reporter has a uniquely strong voice that shines through in his newest collection of essays and articles, which explores the importance we place on the legacy.

Recent Posts

Dovida Expands Healthcare Workforce with 1,500 New Care Positions

Dovida reveals its new hiring program, transforming the former Home Instead business into a home care provider with 1,500 job…

April 13, 2025

Belarus Accepts Pakistani Workers Due to Labor Shortage Crisis

Belarus and Pakistan run a program to let 150,000 Pakistani people work in Belarus because of a government worker shortage.…

April 12, 2025

TCS Forgoes Salary Increments for FY25 Amidst Global Economic Slump

Holding salary hikes, India's largest IT firm, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has incorporated employees. Although dictated by clients to commence…

April 12, 2025

2700 Jobs at Stake: UK’s Urgent Steel Crisis Response

The UK faces a critical steel crisis with 2700 jobs at risk which is reportedly due to the potential closure…

April 12, 2025

TreeHouse Foods Announces Corporate Restructuring with 150 Job Cuts

TreeHouse Foods works to make operations better and more profitable by cutting its corporate workforce by 150 positions. The private-label…

April 11, 2025

US Scientists Seek European Opportunities Following Trump’s Research Cuts

President Trump's funding reductions forced David Die Dejean to leave his National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration office in Miami within…

April 11, 2025